![dakes bible on the courts of heaven dakes bible on the courts of heaven](https://bibleask.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/judgement-heaven-law.jpg)
most satisfactory interpretation, first given by Tertullian does this. "We need therefore to find an interpretation of the phrase which makes water and blood both historical experiences which he passed and witnesses in some sense to his divine/human person. Stott, in a commentary on the letters of John addressed this great truth. He stated, "Certainly the Gnostics confess with their tongues the ONE Jesus Christ, but in their minds they divide Him." (Iraneaus ADVERSUS Haeresies III.16.1). Iraneaus spoke of this in his book, Against Heresies And Knowledge Falsely So Called.
![dakes bible on the courts of heaven dakes bible on the courts of heaven](https://www.dakebible.com/wp-content/uploads/dake-annotated-reference-three-column-kjv-hardback.png)
He was both Son of God and Son of Man at every point in His incarnation. This is a dividing of the natures of Jesus Christ, rather than the established truth of the unity of His Son of God and Son of Man natures. Although some of them accepted the virgin birth of Jesus, others are said to have taught that Jesus was the son of Joseph and Mary, that at His baptism Christ descended upon him in the form of a dove, that he then proclaimed the unknown Father, but that Christ who could not suffer, departed from him at his crucifixion." (Latourette, page 121-122, Harper Collins). "Others, called the Ebionites, maintained that Jesus was merely a man, a prophet, a spokesman for God, as were the great Hebrew prophets of the past. This is an ancient heresy that is called "adoptionism." Kenneth Scott Latourette stated in his book, History of Christianity, Volume I, the following: To suggest that Jesus became the Christ or the "Anointed One" thirty years after His birth is to commit heresy. It is rank heresy and must be totally rejected or our view of Jesus Christ as the eternal Son of God is compromised.
![dakes bible on the courts of heaven dakes bible on the courts of heaven](https://bibleask.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/sanctuary-wilderness.jpg)
No Biblically solid minister or Bible student would accept the quote above. Is ‘Messiah’." (Dake’s Annotated Reference Bible, Finis Jennings Dake, published by Dake Bible Sales, Inc, Lawrenceville, Georgia, New Testament, p. Like the name "Jesus" it has no reference to deity, but to the humanity of the Son of God, who became the Christ or the "Anointed One" 30 years after He was born of Mary. The edition I am quoting from is the sixth printing, December 1971. This quote from Dake’s Bible is the very first New Testament note in the edition that I have owned since the early seventies. As I have now learned, the Dake’s Bible was really the text of the Charismatics before there was a movement called "Charismatic." Let me give you one Scripture that is foundational to what Hagin, Copeland, Hinn, Crouch, etc. I never saw the deceptive quotes that I have recently discovered, probably because to begin with I never used it much. I basically quit using the Dake’s Bible about twenty years ago and simply put it on the shelf.įinally, I am beginning to learn why the inspiration I experienced caused me to move away from Dake’s Annotated Reference Bible. If Dake said it, then it really did not matter what anybody else said or what the general difference was in other Scriptures. The only thing I could identify was that those who became strong in their study of Dake also became arrogant and unteachable. Many years ago, I became leery of the Dake’s Bible, but never really understood why. The Dake’s Bible and Confused Charismatic Theology